Material guidance for TPU, polyurethane, engineering plastics, and elastomer programs Talk with a materials advisor
Sustainability

A practical roadmap for lower-impact rubber and plastic material choices

Sustainability decisions in plastics and elastomers are rarely solved by a single claim. A buyer may need recycled content, but the part still has to mold cleanly, pass mechanical tests, retain color, satisfy food-contact or medical expectations, and support customer-facing documentation. Basf approaches sustainability as a roadmap: clarify the claim, test the material, document the chain of custody, and protect the application performance that made the material necessary in the first place. The goal is not to oversimplify circularity, but to help teams make choices that can survive technical, commercial, and marketing review.

Step 1

Define the claim

Separate recycled content, bio-attributed feedstock, mass balance, reduced carbon footprint, monomaterial design, and recyclability claims before choosing a material.

Step 2

Check the application

Review mechanical retention, food-contact needs, color tolerance, processing stability, sealing behavior, and expected field conditions.

Step 3

Document the route

Gather certificates, chain-of-custody language, regulatory statements, and customer-specific proof before launch timing becomes tight.

Step 4

Scale carefully

Move from lab samples to production trials with converter settings, yield, scrap rate, and supplier availability tracked together.

Technology areas

Where sustainability and performance meet

Mass-balance feedstocks

Useful when a product needs lower fossil resource attribution while retaining established performance and processing behavior.

Best fit:regulated applications with limited formulation freedom

Recycled-content polymers

Appropriate when mechanical property retention, color, odor, traceability, and customer claim language can be validated.

Best fit:packaging, consumer goods, and selected molded parts

Design for recycling

Monomaterial thinking, adhesive selection, pigment choices, and removable components can improve end-of-life compatibility.

Best fit:flexible and rigid packaging redesigns

Sustainability work benefits from an honest constraint map. A recycled resin may create color variation that matters for consumer-facing packaging. A bio-attributed chemistry may solve a carbon accounting goal but still require clear mass-balance documentation. A monomaterial package may improve recycling compatibility while changing barrier or seal behavior. An elastomer part may have limited alternatives because failure would cause leakage, downtime, or safety risk. Basf helps teams compare these trade-offs using the same discipline applied to conventional material selection: start with the application, define proof requirements, and test before claims are made externally.

Collaboration points

Who should be in the sustainability conversation

Procurement

Confirms supplier availability, price exposure, lead time, and documentation terms.

Engineering

Checks mechanical performance, processing windows, tolerances, and test plans.

Quality

Reviews traceability, certificates, change control, and customer approval needs.

Sustainability

Aligns claim wording, reporting boundaries, and customer-facing evidence.

4Main product categories with sustainability questions
6+document types often needed for responsible claims
2030common planning horizon for packaging and recycled-content goals

Make the sustainability target specific enough to test.

Basf can help compare the claim, material family, processing route, and proof documents before your team moves to customer approval.

Discuss a lower-impact option